<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>China on Danilo Falcão da Silva</title><link>https://falcao.org/tags/china/</link><description>Recent content in China on Danilo Falcão da Silva</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 03:00:00 -0215</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://falcao.org/tags/china/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>China's AI Models Just Overtook the US in Usage — And It's Not About Benchmarks</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/china-ai-models-overtook-us-usage/</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 03:00:00 -0215</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/china-ai-models-overtook-us-usage/</guid><description>&lt;p>DeepSeek V3.2 will sell you a million output tokens for forty-two cents.
Claude Opus will sell you the same million for seventy-five dollars.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That&amp;rsquo;s not a discount. That&amp;rsquo;s not even the same market. That&amp;rsquo;s roughly
&lt;strong>170x&lt;/strong>, and once you&amp;rsquo;ve internalized that number, almost everything
else about the &amp;ldquo;China overtook the US in AI usage&amp;rdquo; story stops being
surprising. Developers are not philosophers. When the thing in front of
them is good enough and costs two orders of magnitude less, they route
the traffic and move on. The leaderboard drama is for the timeline. The
invoice is what actually moves workloads.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>