<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Developer-Tools on Danilo Falcão da Silva</title><link>https://falcao.org/tags/developer-tools/</link><description>Recent content in Developer-Tools on Danilo Falcão da Silva</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:22:41 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://falcao.org/tags/developer-tools/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Herdr Adds the Agent State tmux Never Had</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/herdr-adds-agent-state-tmux-never-had/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:22:41 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/herdr-adds-agent-state-tmux-never-had/</guid><description>&lt;p>I moved to tmux about fifteen years ago and
&lt;a href="https://falcao.org/posts/tmux-vs-gnu-screen/">I have not looked back&lt;/a>. I
have also spent a fair number of words arguing that
&lt;a href="https://falcao.org/posts/the-problem-with-changing-tools-too-often/">changing tools too often&lt;/a>
is a tax most teams pay without noticing, and that the question worth
asking about any new tool is narrow and unglamorous: what &lt;em>class of
operational pain&lt;/em> does it delete, and is that worth relearning how
things fail?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>So when a new terminal multiplexer shows up with 18,000 stars and a
launch post, my first instinct is suspicion. The multiplexer problem
has been solved since 1987. Prettier panes are not a reason.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>OpenCode V2 Is No Longer Just My Plan B</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/opencode-v2-no-longer-plan-b/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:10:50 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/opencode-v2-no-longer-plan-b/</guid><description>&lt;p>In May I wrote that Claude Code was my daily driver and
&lt;a href="https://falcao.org/posts/claude-code-opencode-cursor/">OpenCode was my Plan B&lt;/a>.
That label aged quickly.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I meant it as a compliment. Plan B is the tool you&amp;rsquo;re glad
you installed — the one you fall back to during an outage or a client
engagement that won&amp;rsquo;t approve the supply chain. But Plan B also means
&lt;em>second choice&lt;/em>, and I listed three specific reasons it was second: a
less-polished agent loop, a weaker subagent and verification story, and
a smaller skills and integration ecosystem. Those were fair criticisms
in May. The OpenCode 2.0 beta addresses all three head-on.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>