<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Herdr on Danilo Falcão da Silva</title><link>https://falcao.org/tags/herdr/</link><description>Recent content in Herdr on Danilo Falcão da Silva</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:22:41 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://falcao.org/tags/herdr/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Herdr Adds the Agent State tmux Never Had</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/herdr-adds-agent-state-tmux-never-had/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:22:41 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/herdr-adds-agent-state-tmux-never-had/</guid><description>&lt;p>I moved to tmux about fifteen years ago and
&lt;a href="https://falcao.org/posts/tmux-vs-gnu-screen/">I have not looked back&lt;/a>. I
have also spent a fair number of words arguing that
&lt;a href="https://falcao.org/posts/the-problem-with-changing-tools-too-often/">changing tools too often&lt;/a>
is a tax most teams pay without noticing, and that the question worth
asking about any new tool is narrow and unglamorous: what &lt;em>class of
operational pain&lt;/em> does it delete, and is that worth relearning how
things fail?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>So when a new terminal multiplexer shows up with 18,000 stars and a
launch post, my first instinct is suspicion. The multiplexer problem
has been solved since 1987. Prettier panes are not a reason.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>