<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mirantis on Danilo Falcão da Silva</title><link>https://falcao.org/tags/mirantis/</link><description>Recent content in Mirantis on Danilo Falcão da Silva</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:15:00 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://falcao.org/tags/mirantis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Rancher vs Lens: A Platform and a Dashboard, Not the Same Thing</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/rancher-platform-vs-lens/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:15:00 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/rancher-platform-vs-lens/</guid><description>&lt;p>You&amp;rsquo;ll see this comparison on r/kubernetes every couple of months,
phrased as if it&amp;rsquo;s a real choice: &lt;strong>Rancher or Lens?&lt;/strong> The framing is
wrong. They occupy different layers of the stack. Asking which one
&amp;ldquo;wins&amp;rdquo; is like asking whether VS Code beats Kubernetes.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But the question keeps coming up — usually from someone who has Lens
installed, has heard about Rancher, and is trying to figure out
whether they should swap. So let me lay out what each one actually
is, where they overlap, where they don&amp;rsquo;t, and which one earns a place
in a serious on-prem setup.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>