<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Policy on Danilo Falcão da Silva</title><link>https://falcao.org/tags/policy/</link><description>Recent content in Policy on Danilo Falcão da Silva</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:40:00 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://falcao.org/tags/policy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Age Verification Laws Are Coming for Your OS. Linux Doesn't Care.</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/age-verification-linux-immunity/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:40:00 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/age-verification-linux-immunity/</guid><description>&lt;p>For most of 2025 the age-verification conversation was about porn
sites. By the end of the year it had moved up the stack. By 2026 it
is at the &lt;strong>operating system&lt;/strong>, and that is where the story gets
interesting for anyone who cares about how Linux is built.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Nine US states put age-verification laws in force during 2025 alone:
&lt;strong>South Carolina&lt;/strong> (Jan 1), &lt;strong>Florida&lt;/strong> (Jan 1), &lt;strong>Tennessee&lt;/strong>
(Jan 13), &lt;strong>Georgia&lt;/strong> (Jul 1), &lt;strong>Wyoming&lt;/strong> (Jul 1), &lt;strong>North Dakota&lt;/strong>
(Aug 1), &lt;strong>Arizona&lt;/strong> (Sep 26), &lt;strong>Ohio&lt;/strong> (Sep 30), and &lt;strong>Missouri&lt;/strong>
(Nov 30). Roughly half the country now mandates some form of age
gate for adult content, social media, or both.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Musk vs. OpenAI Ends on a Technicality — and the Questions Everyone Wanted Answered Are Still Open</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/musk-openai-verdict/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 19:30:00 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/musk-openai-verdict/</guid><description>&lt;p>A nine-person jury in the Northern District of California took &lt;strong>less
than two hours&lt;/strong> today to unanimously dismiss every claim in Elon
Musk&amp;rsquo;s lawsuit against Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, OpenAI, and
Microsoft. Musk had sought up to &lt;strong>$134 billion in disgorgement&lt;/strong>, the
removal of Altman and Brockman from OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s leadership, and the
unwinding of OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s October 2025 conversion into an $852-billion
public benefit corporation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>He got none of it. The technicality matters more than the headline.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>