<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wayfire on Danilo Falcão da Silva</title><link>https://falcao.org/tags/wayfire/</link><description>Recent content in Wayfire on Danilo Falcão da Silva</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:00:00 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://falcao.org/tags/wayfire/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Omarchy Is Revolutionary for Linux: and It's Not for Me</title><link>https://falcao.org/posts/omarchy-hyprland-revolution-but-not-for-me/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:00:00 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://falcao.org/posts/omarchy-hyprland-revolution-but-not-for-me/</guid><description>&lt;p>I tried Omarchy. I am not staying. And I still think it is the most important thing to happen to the Linux desktop in years.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>All three of those statements are true at the same time, and this post is me holding them without letting one eat the others.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Let me get the correction in before anyone sends it: this is not a review from a Hyprland native. I am a KDE guy with twenty years of floating windows and a mouse in my hand. I ran Omarchy long enough to understand what it is and why it matters, not long enough to rewire my brain around it. So take this for what it is; a field note from someone the product was never really for, who still thinks the product is revolutionary.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>